From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. Timepayment Corp.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
May 25, 2021
316 So. 3d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 5D20-2143

05-25-2021

Robert L. FOX, Sr., Appellant, v. TIMEPAYMENT CORP. and Ice Glass Prints Florida, LLC n/k/a Diamond Ice Prints, LLC, Appellees.

John J. Bennett, of Nardella & Nardella, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellant. Ralph S. Marcadis, of Marcadis Singer, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee Timepayment Corporation. No Appearance for Other Appellee.


John J. Bennett, of Nardella & Nardella, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellant.

Ralph S. Marcadis, of Marcadis Singer, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee Timepayment Corporation.

No Appearance for Other Appellee.

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Petrysian v. Metro. Gen. Ins. , 672 So. 2d 562, 563 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) ("A change in the applicable rule of law resulting from a later appellate decision in an unrelated case is not a ground [under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) ] to vacate a final order." (citing Theisen v. Old Republic Ins. , 468 So. 2d 434, 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) )); Williams v. Skylink Jets, Inc. , 229 So. 3d 1275, 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (recognizing that a final judgment rendered without notice to the defaulting party remains valid as to any claim for liquidated damages).

COHEN, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fox v. Timepayment Corp.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
May 25, 2021
316 So. 3d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Fox v. Timepayment Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT L. FOX, SR., Appellant, v. TIMEPAYMENT CORP. AND ICE GLASS PRINTS…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: May 25, 2021

Citations

316 So. 3d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)