From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 23, 2005
895 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 4D04-4803.

March 23, 2005.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Richard I. Wennet, Judge; L.T. Case No. 99-13662 CFA02.

Jared S. Fox, Okeechobee, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We find appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel to be legally sufficient for a motion for post-conviction relief. We therefore reverse the denial of relief and remand this case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on whether counsel failed to inform appellant of the results of drug testing when they became available so that appellant could reevaluate whether to accept the State's plea offer. On remand, appellant must establish that defense counsel failed to inform him about the results of the lab report before the report was introduced into evidence, that he would have accepted the plea offer had he been correctly advised, and that the acceptance of the plea offer would have resulted in a lesser sentence. See Owens v. State, 792 So.2d 650 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Steel v. State, 684 So.2d 290 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Gomez v. State, 874 So.2d 670 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fox v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 23, 2005
895 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Fox v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jared S. FOX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 23, 2005

Citations

895 So. 2d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)