From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fox v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Mar 18, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-05784 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 18, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-05784

03-18-2014

BRYAN W. FOX, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on September 24, 2012, this action was referred to the Honorable R. Clarke VanDervort, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On February 26, 2014, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 12) wherein it is recommended that this Court grant the Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings; deny the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings; reverse the final decision of the Commission; remand this matter for further proceedings consistent with the Proposed Findings and Recommendation; and dismiss this matter from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by March 17, 2014.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); see also Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983) (holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court ORDERS that the Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Document 7) be GRANTED; the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Document 10) be DENIED; the final decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED; this matter be REMANED for further proceedings consistent with the Proposed Findings and Recommendation pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and this matter be DISMISSED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge VanDervort, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

__________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Fox v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Mar 18, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-05784 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 18, 2014)
Case details for

Fox v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN W. FOX, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-05784 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 18, 2014)