Opinion
Nos. 3D19-1977 3D19-1976 3D19-1975
01-06-2021
Daniel FOX, etc., et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF AVENTURA, et al., Appellees.
Schuler, Halvorson, Weisser, Zoeller & Overbeck, P.A., Jason D. Weisser, and David M. Kerner (West Palm Beach); Harris Appeals, P.A., and Andrew A. Harris (Palm Beach Gardens), for appellants. Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., E. Bruce Johnson, and Christopher J. Stearns (Ft. Lauderdale); Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., Edward G. Guedes and Samuel I. Zeskind, for appellees.
Schuler, Halvorson, Weisser, Zoeller & Overbeck, P.A., Jason D. Weisser, and David M. Kerner (West Palm Beach); Harris Appeals, P.A., and Andrew A. Harris (Palm Beach Gardens), for appellants.
Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman, P.A., E. Bruce Johnson, and Christopher J. Stearns (Ft. Lauderdale); Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., Edward G. Guedes and Samuel I. Zeskind, for appellees.
Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ, and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Roth v. Cohen, 941 So. 2d 496, 500 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("For an issue to be preserved for appeal, ... it ‘must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal must be part of that presentation if it is to be considered preserved.’ " (quoting Archer v. State, 613 So. 2d 446, 448 (Fla. 1993) )).