From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fowler v. Tennis

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
May 23, 2011
CIVIL NO. 3:09-CV-01726 (M.D. Pa. May. 23, 2011)

Summary

holding that uncontested summary judgment assertions which appear meritorious warrant finding against non-responsive party on sixth factor

Summary of this case from Procter & Gamble U.S. Bus. Servs. Co. v. Estate of Rolison

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 3:09-CV-01726.

May 23, 2011


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


AND NOW, THIS 23nd DAY OF MAY, 2011, IT APPEARING TO THE COURT THAT:

(1) Plaintiff, William J. Fowler, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on September 4, 2009 against numerous defendants based on alleged conduct which occurred while he was an inmate at the State Correctional Institution at Rockview;

(2) The action was assigned to Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser;

(3) On September 4, 2009, plaintiff was provided with a copy of this court's Standing Practice Order (Doc. 5), which advised plaintiff of his obligation to inform the court of any address changes. Plaintiff was advised therein that if the court was unable to communicate with him because he failed to keep the court apprised on his address, plaintiff would be deemed to have abandoned the lawsuit;

(4) Following an extensive procedural history, wherein plaintiff changed his address on two occasions and notified the court of his new location (Docs. 68, 74), documents sent to plaintiff at the most recent address provided to the court were returned as "Return to Sender-Refused-Unable to Forward." (Docs. 78, 83, 91, 93, 94, 96);

(5) On May 2, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 95), wherein he recommends that the action be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute;

AND, IT FURTHER APPEARING THAT:

(6) Plaintiff has failed to comply with this court's Standing Practice Order (Doc. 5) in that the court has had no contact from plaintiff, and has been unable to reach plaintiff, since January 24, 2011;

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser dated May 2, 2011 (Doc. 95) is ADOPTED;

(2) The above-captioned action is DISMISSED; and

(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and to forward a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the Magistrate Judge.


Summaries of

Fowler v. Tennis

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
May 23, 2011
CIVIL NO. 3:09-CV-01726 (M.D. Pa. May. 23, 2011)

holding that uncontested summary judgment assertions which appear meritorious warrant finding against non-responsive party on sixth factor

Summary of this case from Procter & Gamble U.S. Bus. Servs. Co. v. Estate of Rolison
Case details for

Fowler v. Tennis

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. FOWLER, Plaintiff, v. FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 23, 2011

Citations

CIVIL NO. 3:09-CV-01726 (M.D. Pa. May. 23, 2011)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. Murry

See Docs. 31, 36, 37. Fowler v. Tennis, No. 3:09-CV-01726, 2011 WL 1988418, at *3 (M.D. Pa. May 2, 2011),…

Procter & Gamble U.S. Bus. Servs. Co. v. Estate of Rolison

Finally, with respect to the sixth factor, as already discussed, Murray's claims also lack merit as no…