From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fowler v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 1997
243 A.D.2d 284 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 9, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, Bronx County (Luis Gonzalez, J.)


In this negligence action premised on allegedly inadequate security measures, plaintiff's claim that his assailants were not residents of the building or invitees is based on his assumption that since he did not recognize them and has not seen them since the attack, they must have been intruders. Such conclusions are speculative and insufficient as a matter of law to establish proximate cause ( Tolliver v. New York City Hous. Auth., 238 A.D.2d 187; Maria S. v. Willow Enters., 234 A.D.2d 177, 178-179) and will not survive defendants' motion for summary judgment.

We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Fowler v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 1997
243 A.D.2d 284 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Fowler v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD FOWLER, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 284 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 32

Citing Cases

New York City Housing v. Housing Auth. Risk

In two additional cases in which the plaintiffs did not recover, the court addressed the related issue of…

Cofield v. New York City Housing Authority

Thus, it was impossible to determine whether he or she was an intruder who gained access to the premises due…