From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fowler v. Miller-Stout

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jan 3, 2008
Case No. C07-5356 RJB/KLS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 3, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. C07-5356 RJB/KLS.

January 3, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 21);
(2) Petitioner objects to the Report and Recommendation, contending that because requested a Certificate of Appealability in the 9th Circuit, he is entitled to relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 23. Dkt. 22. As discussed in the Report and Recommendation, a transfer from one institution to another within the same district does not divest this Court of jurisdiction over Petitioner's claim, and does not violate FRAP 23;
(3) Petitioner's motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Dkt. 15) is DENIED; and
(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.


Summaries of

Fowler v. Miller-Stout

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jan 3, 2008
Case No. C07-5356 RJB/KLS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 3, 2008)
Case details for

Fowler v. Miller-Stout

Case Details

Full title:BILLY D. FOWLER, Petitioner, v. MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Jan 3, 2008

Citations

Case No. C07-5356 RJB/KLS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 3, 2008)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Parish

However, Rule 23(a) "applies only when a habeas action is before the court of appeals on review of a district…