From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fowle v. Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1876
75 N.C. 273 (N.C. 1876)

Opinion

June Term, 1876.

Contract.

In the absence of fraud or collusion, the price agreed upon by the parties to a contract must be presumed to be fair.

(For other points decided, see Tucker v. Raleigh, ante, 267.)

APPEAL from Watts, J., at January Term, 1876, of WAKE.

The points raised by this case were decided in Tucker v. Raleigh, ante, 267.

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

Busbee Busbee for appellant.

Haywood, Fowle, and Snow, contra.


All the points in this case are covered by Tucker v. Raleigh, ante, 267, except that in this case the defendant denies that the price of the services rendered was reasonable.

In the absence of fraud or collusion, the price agreed on by the parties must be taken to be fair.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Fowle v. Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1876
75 N.C. 273 (N.C. 1876)
Case details for

Fowle v. Raleigh

Case Details

Full title:1.] DANIEL G. FOWLE v. THE CITY OF RALEIGH. [2.] DANIEL G. FOWLE v. THE…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1876

Citations

75 N.C. 273 (N.C. 1876)