From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. United States

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 30, 2024
2:23-cv-08929-FMO-JC (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-08929-FMO-JC

07-30-2024

RAMSEY FOSTER Plaintiff(s), v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant(s).


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge

Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 60, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).


Summaries of

Foster v. United States

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 30, 2024
2:23-cv-08929-FMO-JC (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Foster v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RAMSEY FOSTER Plaintiff(s), v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant(s).

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 30, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-08929-FMO-JC (C.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2024)