From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE .
Apr 19, 2016
487 S.W.3d 504 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. ED 102477

04-19-2016

Andre Foster, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Colette Elaine Neuner, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.


Srikant Chigurupati, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Colette Elaine Neuner, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Foster filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief claiming that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because his trial counsel promised him that he would receive a sentence of no more than ten years by pleading guilty. The motion court denied Foster's motion after an evidentiary hearing. Finding no clear error, we affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Foster v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE .
Apr 19, 2016
487 S.W.3d 504 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Foster v. State

Case Details

Full title:Andre Foster, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE .

Date published: Apr 19, 2016

Citations

487 S.W.3d 504 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)