From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Charnock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON
Mar 25, 2015
Civil Action No. 2:14-24232 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 25, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:14-24232

03-25-2015

CARL C. FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE ANN CHARNOCK and JUDGE KAUFMAN and JUDGE BAILEY and JUDGE WEBSTER and JUDGE STUCKY and JUDGE BLOOM and JUDGE ZAKAIB and JUDGE KING and DR. CLINTON MILLS and DR. ADRIAN NAHLA and DINA MOLER and CAMC and ATTORNEY ALEX OF THE CALWELL GROUP and ATTORNEY PAUL STROEBEL and RICHARD MINGUS, Human Rights Commission, and MR. DUIGUID, Human Rights Commission, and HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, and BILLY and HOLLIS LEWIS and CINDY MOSS, Martin Luther King Community Center, and CHIEF OF POLICE, OFFICER YOUNG and OFFICER HOLSTEIN and TAMMY JONES, Charleston Housing, and ROB COLES, Charleston Housing, and CHARLESTON HOUSING and KRT CITY OF CHARLESTON and THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and GOVERNOR EARL RAY TOMBLIN, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending is the motion to dismiss filed August 14, 2014, by the Calwell Practice, L.C., on behalf of defendant "Attorney Alex of the Calwell Group."

This action was previously referred to Dwane L. Tinsley, United States Magistrate Judge, who has submitted his Proposed Findings and Recommendations ("PF&R") pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommends in his PF&R as to Attorney Alex of the Calwell Group alone that the complaint be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the motion to dismiss denied as moot.

On February 23, 2015, the PF&R was filed. On March 16, 2015, plaintiff filed his objections. The objections do not address the deficiencies in the complaint identified by the magistrate judge. They state, in their totality, as follows:

Due to Health [sic] issues and economic hardship; [sic] I Carl C. Foster am requesting this Court to postpone all my hearings, procedures, and schedules. My home life is suffering big time, and I need to repair these fractures in my life. I am requesting the Court grant me a year's time to repair my fractured health and social, home, and Family [sic] life.
(Objecs. at 1). Inasmuch as plaintiff offers no authority supporting the exercise of subject matter jurisdiction, the court is unauthorized to enter the requested stay or otherwise retain jurisdiction over the case. The objections are thus not meritorious.

Following a de novo review, and having concluded that the objections lack merit, it is ORDERED that the PF&R be, and it hereby is, adopted and incorporated herein. It is further ORDERED that this action, as to Attorney Alex of the Calwell Group alone, be, and hereby is, dismissed. It is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, denied as moot.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this written opinion and order to counsel of record and plaintiff.

ENTER: March 25, 2015

/s/_________

John T. Copenhaver, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Foster v. Charnock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON
Mar 25, 2015
Civil Action No. 2:14-24232 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Foster v. Charnock

Case Details

Full title:CARL C. FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE ANN CHARNOCK and JUDGE KAUFMAN and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON

Date published: Mar 25, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:14-24232 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 25, 2015)