From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1959
160 N.E.2d 90 (N.Y. 1959)

Opinion

Argued March 10, 1959

Decided May 29, 1959

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, SAMUEL C. COLEMAN, J.

Bernard Meyerson and Seymour Epstein for appellant.

Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel ( John A. Murray and Seymour B. Quel of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that plaintiff established a prima facie case in negligence. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DYE, FULD and FROESSEL. Judges DESMOND, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that the undisputed proof as to the physical facts, including photographs submitted by both parties, established that the depression in the sidewalk was too slight to constitute a trap.


Summaries of

Foster v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1959
160 N.E.2d 90 (N.Y. 1959)
Case details for

Foster v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM FOSTER, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1959

Citations

160 N.E.2d 90 (N.Y. 1959)
160 N.E.2d 90
188 N.Y.S.2d 557

Citing Cases

Tiperneni v. State

There is also evidence that maintenance personnel observed the seam prior to the date of the accident. Such…

Purcell v. New York World's Fair 1964/1965 Corp.

No exceptions were taken to the charge. It is our opinion that the issues were properly submitted to the jury…