From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. City Council of the City of Berkeley

Supreme Court of California
Apr 28, 1927
201 Cal. 769 (Cal. 1927)

Opinion

Docket No. S.F. 12342.

April 28, 1927.

PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the City Council of Berkeley to reconsider a zoning ordinance. Granted.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Frank V. Cornish and J.S. Hutchinson for Petitioner.

E.J. Sinclair and James M. Koford for Respondents.


THE COURT.

[1] Application for a writ of mandate to compel the City Council and other officials of the City of Berkeley to reconsider a certain ordinance relating to the rezoning of a certain restricted district within said city, and to either repeal the ordinance or submit the same to a referendum vote of the electors of the city at the next general election or at a special election to be called for such purpose. This proceeding differs in none of its essential aspects from the proceeding entitled Dwyer v. City Council of the City of Berkeley, etc., 200 Cal. 505 [ 253 P. 932].

Upon the authority of that decision it is, therefore, ordered that the writ issue as prayed for herein.


Summaries of

Foster v. City Council of the City of Berkeley

Supreme Court of California
Apr 28, 1927
201 Cal. 769 (Cal. 1927)
Case details for

Foster v. City Council of the City of Berkeley

Case Details

Full title:E.R. FOSTER, Petitioner, v. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BERKELEY et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 28, 1927

Citations

201 Cal. 769 (Cal. 1927)
255 P. 1118

Citing Cases

Knowlton v. Hezmalhalch

[3] The remaining point presented and raised by the demurrer, which is necessary to determine on this appeal,…