From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foss v. Martel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 18, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-3551 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-3551 JAM JFM P

03-18-2013

RAYMOND CHRISTIAN FOSS, Petitioner, v. MIKE MARTEL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

On February 4, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed February 1, 2013, directing the Clerk of the Court to maintain a document filed by petitioner under seal. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed February 1, 2013, is affirmed.

John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Foss v. Martel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 18, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-3551 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Foss v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND CHRISTIAN FOSS, Petitioner, v. MIKE MARTEL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-3551 JAM JFM P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)