From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortkamp v. Ingraham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 17, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-34 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:15-cv-34

03-17-2015

YVONNE FORTKAMP, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JEFFREY R. INGRAHAM, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Supplemental Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Supplemental Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice under the Eleventh Amendment as to any official capacity claims made against Judge Ingraham and with prejudice as barred by absolute judicial immunity as to any personal capacity claims. This case is TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. March 17, 2015.

/s/_________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Fortkamp v. Ingraham

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 17, 2015
Case No. 3:15-cv-34 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Fortkamp v. Ingraham

Case Details

Full title:YVONNE FORTKAMP, Plaintiff, v. JUDGE JEFFREY R. INGRAHAM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 17, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:15-cv-34 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 17, 2015)