From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Techs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 22, 2024
20-cv-03343-EMC (TSH) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)

Opinion

20-cv-03343-EMC (TSH)

04-22-2024

FORTINET, INC., Plaintiff, v. FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER RE MOTION TO SEAL

RE: DKT. NO. 235

THOMAS S. HIXSON, United States Magistrate Judge

The motion to seal at ECF No. 235 is GRANTED as to Exhibits 4 and 5. As to Exhibit 3, Fortinet's proposed redactions in ECF No. 236 are acceptable. Because the redactions have already been filed in the public record in ECF No. 236-1, no further action on the motion to seal is necessary.

This order terminates ECF No. 235.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Techs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 22, 2024
20-cv-03343-EMC (TSH) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Techs.

Case Details

Full title:FORTINET, INC., Plaintiff, v. FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 22, 2024

Citations

20-cv-03343-EMC (TSH) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 22, 2024)