From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fort Madison Associates v. Caldararo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 2001
280 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted January 24, 2001

February 20, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for conversion, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), dated January 12, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendant John Caldararo for leave to renew his prior motion to vacate a judgment entered December 8, 1997, upon his default and, upon renewal, granted that motion.

Spitzer Feldman, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Michael H. Smith of counsel), for appellant.

Samuel J. Pierce, Armonk, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, GOLDSTEIN and SMITH, JJ., concur.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the respondent's motion is denied, and the judgment is reinstated.

A party attempting to vacate a default judgment must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see, Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333). While the determination as to whether a party has established a reasonable excuse for a default lies within the sound discretion of the trial court, here the court improvidently exercised its discretion (see, Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568, 569) in accepting law office failure as a reasonable excuse (see, CPLR 2005). The appellant demonstrated a pattern of willful default and neglect by the respondent. Such conduct should not be excused (see, Eretz Funding v. Shalosh Assocs., 266 A.D.2d 184; Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, supra). Accordingly, the order must be reversed and the judgment reinstated.


Summaries of

Fort Madison Associates v. Caldararo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 20, 2001
280 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Fort Madison Associates v. Caldararo

Case Details

Full title:FORT MADISON ASSOCIATES, APPELLANT, v. JOHN CALDARARO, RESPONDENT, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 20, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 808

Citing Cases

ROSE DEV. CORP. v. NAGI

Inasmuch as landlord was not surprised or prejudiced and landlord had ample opportunity to respond and did in…

Pirov v. New York City Dept. of Bldgs.

His excuse is that the notices of violation were posted and mailed to the address of the synagogue where he…