From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forshee v. Dowdney

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 15, 1928
143 A. 917 (N.J. 1928)

Opinion

Decided October 15th, 1928.

Appeal of Lillian Rothrock et al.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery.

Messrs. Kelsey Ludwig, for the appellant.

Mr. Philip F. Sauer and Messrs. Melosh, Morten Melosh, for the respondent.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 101 N.J. Eq. 446. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Forshee v. Dowdney

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 15, 1928
143 A. 917 (N.J. 1928)
Case details for

Forshee v. Dowdney

Case Details

Full title:PERCIVAL FORSHEE, executor, c., complainant, v. IDA DOWDNEY et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 15, 1928

Citations

143 A. 917 (N.J. 1928)
143 A. 917

Citing Cases

U.S. Trust Co. v. Jamison

The first question propounded is: What effect did the death of Harrie W. Keihl prior to the death of the…

Rippel v. King

When there is a gift to a "class" while the beneficiaries may take as tenants in common, the members of the…