From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forest v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 28, 1985
690 S.W.2d 1 (Ark. 1985)

Opinion

Opinion delivered May 28, 1985

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK — ATTORNEY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO FILE RECORD. — The attorney is responsible for filing the record; he cannot shift that responsibility to the trial judge or to the court reporter.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; denied.

John F. Gibson, Jr., for appellant.

No response.


With respect to this motion for a rule on the clerk, the attorney for the appellant insists that it is the court reporter's responsibility to prepare the record and to notify the attorney if more time is needed. Counsel therefore refuses to recognize his responsibility for filing the record on time. Counsel is in error. We have repeatedly held that the attorney is responsible for filing the record and cannot shift that responsibility to the trial judge or to the court reporter. See, for example, Christopher v. Jones, 271 Ark. 911, 611 S.W.2d 521 (1981). As stated in our per curiam order on belated appeals in criminal cases, 265 Ark. 964, we put "the responsibility where it belongs, on the shoulders of the lawyer who is at fault."

No good cause having been shown for the tardy filing of the record in this case, the motion for a rule on the clerk is denied.


Summaries of

Forest v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 28, 1985
690 S.W.2d 1 (Ark. 1985)
Case details for

Forest v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mikey Dale FORREST v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: May 28, 1985

Citations

690 S.W.2d 1 (Ark. 1985)
690 S.W.2d 1

Citing Cases

Lewis v. State

Colvin's primary contention is that he relied on both oral and written representations by the Clerk of the…

Cook v. State

Watkins alleges further, by motion, that the record should have been delivered by priority mail to the…