From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foremost Insurance Company v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1984
103 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

July 13, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Genesee County, Kramer, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green, O'Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed with costs, and motion denied, in accordance with the following memorandum: A question of fact exists concerning whether the motorcycle operated by Geisler was a "temporary substitute" motorcycle. Plaintiff, as the party moving for summary judgment, had the burden of presenting evidentiary facts in admissible form showing that there was no defense to its cause of action. Plaintiff failed to make this showing. The admissions purportedly made by defendant Geisler over the telephone had no probative value since they were not sworn to by Geisler or by the person who heard them. On the other hand, the sworn statements of Murphy made at his examination before trial indicated that the motorcycle involved in the collision may have been a "temporary substitute".

¶ Denial of plaintiff's motion is without prejudice to renewal after completion of discovery.


Summaries of

Foremost Insurance Company v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 13, 1984
103 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Foremost Insurance Company v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. VALERIE E. MOORE, Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 13, 1984

Citations

103 A.D.2d 1042 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

Kretschmann v. Board of Education

Anything less requires dismissal of the motion regardless of the contents of the opposing party's papers.…

Kretschmann v. BD. OF EDUC.

(Royal v Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 122 AD2d 132 [2d Dept 1986].) Anything less requires dismissal of the motion…