From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Wexford Health Source

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Feb 20, 2014
Case No. 13-cv-43-JPG-DGW (S.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2014)

Summary

concluding the defendant could not assert the plaintiff failed to exhaust because the ARB rejected the grievance as untimely when the grievance officer had previously accepted the grievance and addressed it on the merits

Summary of this case from Venson v. Gregson

Opinion

Case No. 13-cv-43-JPG-DGW

02-20-2014

JIMMIE L. FORD, Plaintiff, v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCE, JANETTE KINKADE, L. OVERALL and S. HAGENE, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R & R") (Doc. 64) of Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson recommending this Court grant in part and deny in part defendants Janette Kincade's and Samantha Hagene's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 40) in which they argue plaintiff Jimmie L. Ford failed to exhaust administrative remedies.

The Court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations of the magistrate judge in a report and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The Court must review de novo the portions of the report to which objections are made. The Court has discretion to conduct a new hearing and may consider the record before the magistrate judge anew or receive any further evidence deemed necessary. Id. "If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error." Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999).

The Court has received no objection to the R & R. The Court has reviewed the entire file and finds that the R & R is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the Court

• ADOPTS the R & R (Doc. 64);
• GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 40). The Court grants the motion to the extent it finds that Ford failed to exhaust
administrative remedies against defendant Janette Kincade, and denies the motion with respect to defendant Samantha Hagene;
• DISMISSES defendant Janette Kinkade from this case; and
• DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly at the close of the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

J. PHIL GILBERT

DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ford v. Wexford Health Source

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Feb 20, 2014
Case No. 13-cv-43-JPG-DGW (S.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2014)

concluding the defendant could not assert the plaintiff failed to exhaust because the ARB rejected the grievance as untimely when the grievance officer had previously accepted the grievance and addressed it on the merits

Summary of this case from Venson v. Gregson
Case details for

Ford v. Wexford Health Source

Case Details

Full title:JIMMIE L. FORD, Plaintiff, v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCE, JANETTE KINKADE, L…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Feb 20, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13-cv-43-JPG-DGW (S.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2014)

Citing Cases

Venson v. Gregson

In response, Plaintiff cites to a case from this district that held when the grievance officer and warden…

Shakurr v. Swalls

This reasoning supports finding that a prisoner's remedies are exhausted when a Grievance Officer addresses a…