From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 16, 2000
17 S.W.3d 606 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76441.

FILED: May 16, 2000.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. B.C. DRUMM, JUDGE.

S. Paige Canfiled, Assistant Public Defender, 1221 Locust Street, Ste 350, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Gregory L. Barnes, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, P.J., Paul J. Simon, J., and James R. Dowd, J.



ORDER


This is an appeal from a judgment denying a Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
May 16, 2000
17 S.W.3d 606 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Ford v. State

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE FORD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: May 16, 2000

Citations

17 S.W.3d 606 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)