From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Pliler

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 16, 2021
1:21-cv-01470 (AT) (SDA) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01470 (AT) (SDA)

09-16-2021

Kelvin Ford, Petitioner, v. Warden W.S. Pliler, Respondent.


ORDER

STEWART D. AARON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1), Respondent's response thereto (ECF No. 11), and Petitioner's reply in further support thereof (ECF No. 19). Petitioner raises in his reply an argument not identified in his Petition-namely, that the 2003 incident serving as the basis for the good-conduct-time deduction at issue should be “expunge[d]” because Petitioner “was never provided a DHO Report” corresponding to that incident, “in contravention of his due process rights.” (Id. at 2.) The Court hereby grants Respondent leave to file a surreply, of no more than 10 pages, responding to this argument, if he so chooses. Any such surreply shall be filed no later than Thursday, September 30, 2021.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ford v. Pliler

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 16, 2021
1:21-cv-01470 (AT) (SDA) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Ford v. Pliler

Case Details

Full title:Kelvin Ford, Petitioner, v. Warden W.S. Pliler, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 16, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01470 (AT) (SDA) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2021)