From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ford v. Child Support

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division
Jun 7, 2010
3:10-CV-304-TMH WO (M.D. Ala. Jun. 7, 2010)

Opinion

3:10-CV-304-TMH WO.

June 7, 2010


ORDER


On May 10, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. 6) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Recommendation (Doc. 6) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; and
2. Plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Department of Human Resources be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);
3. Plaintiff's challenge to the constitutionality of his current confinement be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time; and
4. This case be DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii).

An appropriate judgment will be entered.


Summaries of

Ford v. Child Support

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division
Jun 7, 2010
3:10-CV-304-TMH WO (M.D. Ala. Jun. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Ford v. Child Support

Case Details

Full title:GERALD BERNARD FORD, Plaintiff, v. CHILD SUPPORT (DHR), et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 7, 2010

Citations

3:10-CV-304-TMH WO (M.D. Ala. Jun. 7, 2010)

Citing Cases

Mykins v. Alabama Dep't of Human Resources

Ex parte Alabama Department of Human Resources, 999 So. 2d 891, 896 (Ala. 2008) (ADHR); Ex parte Trawick, 959…

Melvin v. Simmons

As a number of federal courts have found, the Alabama DHR is a state agency and is protected by the Eleventh…