From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Forciea v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 4, 2009
08-CV-2219 (JMR/FLN) (D. Minn. Sep. 4, 2009)

Opinion

08-CV-2219 (JMR/FLN).

September 4, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, Patrick Forciea, objects to the Report and Recommendation, issued May 22, 2009 [Docket No. 80], by the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge. The Report recommended granting defendant's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 62], and denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 58]. The Court has considered the parties' subsequent submissions, regardless as to their compliance with the Local Rules.

Based upon a de novo review of the record herein, the Court adopts the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 62] is granted.

2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 58] is denied.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Forciea v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 4, 2009
08-CV-2219 (JMR/FLN) (D. Minn. Sep. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Forciea v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:Patrick Forciea v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Sep 4, 2009

Citations

08-CV-2219 (JMR/FLN) (D. Minn. Sep. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Czech v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America

The Eighth Circuit "has not definitively ruled on whether an ERISA claim accrues at the time of the initial…