From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fontenberry v. MV Transp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2013
Civil Case No.: 2:12-cv-01996-JAM-JFM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Case No.: 2:12-cv-01996-JAM-JFM

03-20-2013

RICHARD FONTENBERRY, HUNTER BLAINE, and KEITH WARD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MV TRANSPORTATION, INC.; and DOES 1-20, Defendants.

THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760 Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs Richard Fontenberry, Hunter Blaine, and Keith Ward


THE TIDRICK LAW FIRM
STEVEN G. TIDRICK, SBN 224760
Attorneys for Individual and Representative
Plaintiffs Richard Fontenberry, Hunter
Blaine, and Keith Ward

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS'

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT


The Honorable John A. Mendez

[PROPOSED] ORDER

After reviewing the papers submitted by the parties, and the oral arguments presented by counsel, the Court rules as follows:

Good cause having been shown, Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second amended collective and class action complaint is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ


Summaries of

Fontenberry v. MV Transp., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 20, 2013
Civil Case No.: 2:12-cv-01996-JAM-JFM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Fontenberry v. MV Transp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD FONTENBERRY, HUNTER BLAINE, and KEITH WARD, on behalf of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 20, 2013

Citations

Civil Case No.: 2:12-cv-01996-JAM-JFM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2013)