From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fontainebleau Hotel v. Lowry Electric

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 20, 1972
269 So. 2d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-331.

November 28, 1972. Rehearing Denied December 20, 1972.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Francis X. Knuck, J.

Richard P. Kenney, Miami, for appellant.

Patton, Kanner, Nadeau, Segal Stobs, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.


This appeal is by the defendant below from an adverse judgment in a mechanics' lien foreclosure action.

The appellant seeks reversal upon the contention that the plaintiff lienor was barred from recovery because of its failure to furnish an affidavit stating that all lienors had been paid in full, etc., as required of a contractor under § 713.06(3) (d) Fla. Stat., F.S.A. We hold the contention is without merit. That defense was not pleaded. It is sufficiently revealed on the record the capacity of the plaintiff was that of a subcontractor, for certain electrical work. As a subcontractor, the plaintiff was not required to furnish such an affidavit. Moreover, although it appears that the plaintiff subcontractor had agreed it would furnish such an affidavit upon five days' demand by the owner (lessee in possession), it was not alleged or shown that the demand was made.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Fontainebleau Hotel v. Lowry Electric

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 20, 1972
269 So. 2d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Fontainebleau Hotel v. Lowry Electric

Case Details

Full title:FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 20, 1972

Citations

269 So. 2d 738 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Sowers v. Hoenstine

Hoenstine contends that the filing requirement is not applicable to him because he was not a "contractor,"…

Leader Mortg v. Rickards Elec. Serv

The court also pointed out that any doubt as to whether the sworn statement is required should be resolved in…