From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fonseca v. First Nat'l Bank of Omaha

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug 4, 2021
322 So. 3d 243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 4D20-2612

08-04-2021

David FONSECA, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Appellee.

David Fonseca, Weston, pro se. No appearance for appellee.


David Fonseca, Weston, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory [and] [w]ithout knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.").

Forst, Klingensmith and Artau, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fonseca v. First Nat'l Bank of Omaha

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Aug 4, 2021
322 So. 3d 243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Fonseca v. First Nat'l Bank of Omaha

Case Details

Full title:David FONSECA, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Aug 4, 2021

Citations

322 So. 3d 243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)