Fonseca v. First Nat'l Bank of Omaha

Full title: DAVID FONSECA, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Appellee.

Court: Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 4, 2021

No. 4D20-2612 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 4, 2021)

Opinion

4D20-2612

08-04-2021

DAVID FONSECA, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Appellee.

David Fonseca, Weston, pro se. No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Terri-Ann Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. COSO20008632.

David Fonseca, Weston, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory [and] [w]ithout knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.").

FORST, KLINGENSMITH and ARTAU, JJ., concur.