From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Folger v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Dec 1, 1961
350 S.W.2d 703 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961)

Opinion

September 22, 1961. Rehearing Denied December 1, 1961.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lincoln County, E.C. Newlin, Special Judge.

Pat Rankin, Stanford, for appellant.

John B. Breckinridge, Atty. Gen., H.D. Reed, Asst. Atty. Gen., F.D. Curry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leslie D. Aberson, Atty. Dept. of Highways, Frankfort, for appellee.


In Folger v. Commonwealth, Ky. 1959, 330 S.W.2d 106, reversing a circuit court judgment to the contrary, we held that the appellants, Folger and Mathias, had such an interest pertaining to certain property acquired by the state that they were entitled to compensation for its destruction. The case was remanded for further proceedings. After receiving the evidence thereupon introduced, followed by a verdict awarding appellants $4,000, the trial court sustained the state's motion for judgment n. o. v. and again gave judgment against the appellants, this time on the ground that their rights remained untaken, unviolated and undestroyed. Hence this second appeal.

A re-examination of our first opinion in this case has convinced us that we were wrong in holding the appellants entitled to recover. See Cumberland River Oil Company v. Commonwealth, Ky. 1961, 350 S.W.2d 700, decided today. As to the law of the case, it falls within the qualification stated in Union Light, Heat Power Co. v. Blackwell's Adm'r, Ky. 1956, 291 S.W.2d 539.

Judgment affirmed.

BIRD, C.J., dissenting.


Summaries of

Folger v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Dec 1, 1961
350 S.W.2d 703 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961)
Case details for

Folger v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:W. E. FOLGER Curtls Mathlas, d/b/a Mathlas Folger Oil Company, Appellant…

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Dec 1, 1961

Citations

350 S.W.2d 703 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961)

Citing Cases

Newman v. Newman

As a final argument appellant asks that we set aside our opinion in the previous case wherein we held the…

Inman v. Inman

In such a case it is deemed to be the duty of the court to admit its error rather than to sanction an unjust…