From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foley v. Exolon-Esk Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 7, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Michalek, J. — Summary Judgment.

Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Callahan, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs' submissions in opposition to defendant's motion raised an issue of fact whether the presence of a greasy substance on defendant's loading dock was a dangerous condition that occurred at regular intervals so as to constitute constructive notice ( see, Morales v. Jolee Consolidators, 173 A.D.2d 315; Weisenthal v. Pickman, 153 A.D.2d 849, 851).


Summaries of

Foley v. Exolon-Esk Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 7, 1999
261 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Foley v. Exolon-Esk Corporation

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS J. FOLEY et al., Appellants, v. EXOLON-ESK CORPORATION, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 7, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
689 N.Y.S.2d 572

Citing Cases

Cotter v. Lasco, Inc.

Because defendants failed to meet their initial burden with respect to that issue, the burden never shifted…

Cotter v. Lasco, Inc.

Because defendants failed to meet their initial burden with respect to that issue, the burden never shifted…