From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foisy v. Penn Aluminum Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 16, 1969
31 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

January 16, 1969

Appeal from the Onondaga Special Term.

Present — Bastow, P.J., Goldman, Del Vecchio, Marsh and Henry, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: Special Term granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint for failure to prosecute, pursuant to CPLR 3216. Respondent admits that a note of issue was filed just prior to or simultaneous with the making of the motion to dismiss. Under these circumstances the only delay which Special Term could consider was that which occurred since the date of the filing of the note of issue ( Giancone v. City of N.Y., 29 A.D.2d 756). As we held in Williams v. Baker ( 29 A.D.2d 915) the facts here presented require a denial of the motion to dismiss.


Summaries of

Foisy v. Penn Aluminum Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 16, 1969
31 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Foisy v. Penn Aluminum Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GERMAINE FOISY et al., Appellants, v. PENN ALUMINUM INC., Respondent, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1969

Citations

31 A.D.2d 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Cohn v. Borchard Affiliations

Since it expressly commands the court that "No dismissal shall be directed" unless it was preceded by service…

Thompson v. Thompson

The record reveals that plaintiff never sought a discontinuance of any sort. ¶ Special Term was prohibited…