From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fodness v. U.S. Steel Corporation

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 24, 2021
Civ. 21-928 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 24, 2021)

Opinion

Civ. 21-928 (MJD/LIB)

06-24-2021

Matthew Fodness, Plaintiff, v. U.S. Steel Corporation, Defendant.


ORDER

Michael J. Davis, United States District Court

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated April 26, 2021. [Doc. No. 3] Plaintiff has filed an objection.

Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, and in consideration of the applicable law, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice; and

2. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, [Docket No. 2], is

DENIED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Fodness v. U.S. Steel Corporation

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jun 24, 2021
Civ. 21-928 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Fodness v. U.S. Steel Corporation

Case Details

Full title:Matthew Fodness, Plaintiff, v. U.S. Steel Corporation, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 24, 2021

Citations

Civ. 21-928 (MJD/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 24, 2021)