From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flynn v. Custance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1947
272 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

June 16, 1947.

Present — Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ.


Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as a consequence of the failure of defendant to light a hallway in a multiple dwelling, as required by former section 40 Mult. Dwell. of the Multiple Dwelling Law. The jury having disagreed, the trial court granted defendant's motion, as to which decision had been reserved, dismissed plaintiff's complaint, and directed that plaintiff's exceptions and his motion for a new trial be heard in this court in the first instance, pursuant to section 550 of the Civil Practice Act. We have not considered plaintiff's exceptions to the court's charge and refusals to charge. Since the jury rendered no verdict the questions thereby presented are academic. Plaintiff's exception to the dismissal of his complaint unanimously overruled, his motion for a new trial denied and judgment dismissing the complaint directed to be entered, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Flynn v. Custance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 1947
272 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Flynn v. Custance

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL FLYNN, Plaintiff, v. MINNIE CUSTANCE, Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 1947

Citations

272 App. Div. 918 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)