From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fluksik v. Delmar Owners, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1998
248 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 30, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff fell in the stairway of the defendant's building after he missed a step which he claimed he was unable to see because of the design of the stairs and allegedly poor lighting. At the commencement of trial, counsel for both the plaintiff and the defendant consented to place certain photographs in evidence which the plaintiff's counsel stipulated were fair and accurate representations of the staircase at the time of the accident. The photographs constituted sufficient evidence to support the trial court's finding that, as a matter of law, the plaintiff had failed to establish a prima facie case of negligence (see, Stillman v. Frankel, 44 A.D.2d 821, affd 36 N.Y.2d 899).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

Thompson, J. P., Joy, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fluksik v. Delmar Owners, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1998
248 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Fluksik v. Delmar Owners, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD FLUKSIK, Appellant, v. DELMAR OWNERS, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 321

Citing Cases

Van Orden v. St. Cecilia's Church

Contrary to plaintiff's contention, defendant met its burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a…

Pergament v. Mohr-Mac of Shirley, Inc.

This provision does not expressly require painting the curb, but is a general provision and, thus, does "not…