From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. Saul

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division
Jun 14, 2021
1:20-CV-107-DMB-DAS (N.D. Miss. Jun. 14, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-CV-107-DMB-DAS

06-14-2021

ROGER DALE FLOYD PLAINTIFF v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security DEFENDANT


ORDER

DEBRA M. BROWN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On May 27, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) in this appeal from an unfavorable decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Doc. #23. The R&R recommends that the decision be reversed and remanded as unsupported by substantial evidence. Id. at 9. No. objections to the R&R were filed.

“With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F.Supp.2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996)). The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds no plain error on the face of the record. Accordingly, the R&R [23] is ADOPTED as the order of the Court. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for further consideration.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Floyd v. Saul

United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division
Jun 14, 2021
1:20-CV-107-DMB-DAS (N.D. Miss. Jun. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Floyd v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:ROGER DALE FLOYD PLAINTIFF v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Mississippi, Aberdeen Division

Date published: Jun 14, 2021

Citations

1:20-CV-107-DMB-DAS (N.D. Miss. Jun. 14, 2021)