From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. Glenn Gardens Assocs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 10, 2020
18 CIVIL 8519 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 8519 (VEC)

02-10-2020

BETTY FLOYD, Plaintiff, v. GLENN GARDENS ASSOCIATES; GRENADIER REALTY CORP.; GUTMAN, MINTZ, SONNENFELDT; and THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPT. OF HOUSING PRESERVATION & DEVELOPMENT, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated January 31, 2020, the R&R is adopted in its entirety. Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend in DENIED. Because the R&R gave the parties adequate warning, Plaintiff's failure to file adequate and specific objections to the R&R precludes appellate review of this decision. Accordingly, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, permission to proceed in forma pauperis for purposes of appeal is denied; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

February 10, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Floyd v. Glenn Gardens Assocs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Feb 10, 2020
18 CIVIL 8519 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Floyd v. Glenn Gardens Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:BETTY FLOYD, Plaintiff, v. GLENN GARDENS ASSOCIATES; GRENADIER REALTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Feb 10, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 8519 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 10, 2020)