From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. Bank of Am., N.A.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jan 25, 2019
262 So. 3d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Summary

remanding for an award of attorney's fees where appellant was "entitled" to her fees under § 57.105 because she prevailed below

Summary of this case from O'Steen v. Lafayette State Bank (In re O'Steen)

Opinion

Case No. 5D17-2712

01-25-2019

Daniela FLOYD, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP F/K/A Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP and Middlebrook Pines Condominium Association, Inc., Appellees.

Thomas Eross, Jr., and Kendrick Almaguer, of The Ticktin Law Group, PLLC, Deerfield Beach, for Appellant. Jason D. Silver, of Greenspoon Marder, of Ft. Lauderdale, Roy A. Diaz and Adam A. Diaz, of SHD Legal Group PA, Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellee Bank of America, N.A., Successor By Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP F/K/A Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP. No Appearance for Appellee, Middlebrook Pines Condominium Association, Inc.


Thomas Eross, Jr., and Kendrick Almaguer, of The Ticktin Law Group, PLLC, Deerfield Beach, for Appellant.

Jason D. Silver, of Greenspoon Marder, of Ft. Lauderdale, Roy A. Diaz and Adam A. Diaz, of SHD Legal Group PA, Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellee Bank of America, N.A., Successor By Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP F/K/A Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP.

No Appearance for Appellee, Middlebrook Pines Condominium Association, Inc.

HARRIS, J.

Appellant appeals the trial court's final order denying her motion for attorneys' fees following the involuntary dismissal of Appellee's residential mortgage foreclosure action. Appellant argues that she is entitled to attorneys' fees under section 57.105(7), Florida Statutes (2018), because she prevailed below by proving that while Appellee had standing at the time of trial, it lacked standing at the inception of the foreclosure suit. We agree. See Madl v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., 244 So.3d 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ; see also Glass v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC., 44 Fla. L. Weekly S100a ––– So.3d ––––, 2019 WL 98152 (Fla. Jan. 4, 2019) ; Harris v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D141a, ––– So.3d ––––, 2018 WL 6816177 (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 28, 2018).

Therefore, we reverse and remand for entry of an order granting Appellant's motion for attorneys' fees.

REVERSED and REMANDED

ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Floyd v. Bank of Am., N.A.

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jan 25, 2019
262 So. 3d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

remanding for an award of attorney's fees where appellant was "entitled" to her fees under § 57.105 because she prevailed below

Summary of this case from O'Steen v. Lafayette State Bank (In re O'Steen)
Case details for

Floyd v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Case Details

Full title:DANIELA FLOYD, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 25, 2019

Citations

262 So. 3d 270 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Citing Cases

O'Steen v. Lafayette State Bank (In re O'Steen)

Still other courts find the prevailing party "is entitled" to its fees if the contract provision is…