From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Floyd v. Amazon.com

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 9, 2024
2:22-cv-01599 KKE (W.D. Wash. Apr. 9, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01599 KKE

04-09-2024

STEVEN FLOYD, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM INC. and APPLE INC., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING APPLE'S MOTION TO SEAL

KYMBERLY K. EVANSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Apple Inc.'s unopposed motion to seal parts of the declaration of Mark A. Perry and all of the attached exhibits (Dkt. No. 88), which were filed in support of Apple's and Defendant Amazon.com Inc.'s opposition to Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the first amended complaint and to intervene. Dkt. No. 84. The Court grants the motion to seal for the following reasons.

“In this circuit, we start with a strong presumption in favor of access to court records.” Foltz v. State FarmMut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003). The party seeking to seal a court record generally “bears the burden of overcoming this strong presumption by meeting the compelling reasons standard. That is, the party must articulate compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings that outweigh the general history of access and the public policies favoring disclosure[.]” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006) (cleaned up). The Local Rules of this district require a party filing a motion to seal to inter alia identify the interests that warrant sealing and the injury that would result if the motion is not granted, and to explain why a less restrictive alternative than sealing is insufficient. Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 5(g)(3)(B).

The Court finds that Apple has shown compelling reasons to seal the materials identified below, because they contain confidential business information regarding Apple's internal systems and processes for protecting data that, if made public, could harm Apple's competitive standing. No means other than sealing will protect the confidential business information, the protection of which outweighs the public right of access to court records. See, e.g., Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1097 (9th Cir. 2016) (indicating that compelling reasons to grant a motion to seal would exist “when a court record might be used ... ‘as sources of business information that might harm a litigant's competitive standing[]'” (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commnc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598-99 (1978))).

Additionally, Apple lias shown compelling reasons to seal the exhibits attached to the Perry declaration, because they contain personally identifiable information (“PH”) related to Plaintiff Steven Floyd's devices that, if made public, could harm Floyd's personal privacy and data security interests. No means other than sealing will protect the PIL the protection of which outweighs the public right of access to court records. See, e.g., Activision Publ'g, Inc. v. EngineOwning UG, No. CV 2:22-cv-00051-MWF (JCx), 2023 WL 2347134, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2023) (“[T]here are compelling reasons to seal the various parties' customers' personal information, which includes the customers' names, account numbers, IP addresses, email addresses, and/or customer activities on certain platforms, in order to protect the customers' privacy.”).

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Apple's motion to seal. Dkt. No. 84. Exhibits A-P attached to the Perry declaration shall be maintained under seal until further order of the Court. Furthennore, the Perry declaration shall be partially sealed until further order of the Corn!, consistent with the table below:

Portion of Document Sought to be Sealed

Document Title

Reason to Seal

2:7-10

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

2:14

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

2:19

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

2:24

Peny Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

2:28

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

3:1

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

3:6

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

3:11

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

3:16

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

3:21

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

3:26

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

4:3

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

4:8

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

4:13

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

4:18

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

4:23

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

4:28

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.

5:5

Perry Declaration

Reflects information regarding Apple's confidential, internal processes and systems for maintaining data about Apple devices and users.


Summaries of

Floyd v. Amazon.com

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Apr 9, 2024
2:22-cv-01599 KKE (W.D. Wash. Apr. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Floyd v. Amazon.com

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN FLOYD, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Apr 9, 2024

Citations

2:22-cv-01599 KKE (W.D. Wash. Apr. 9, 2024)