From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flowers v. Acousti Engineering Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 10, 2004
888 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 1D03-0619.

December 10, 2004.

An appeal from order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. S. Scott Stephens, Judge.

T. Rhett Smith and Teresa E. Liles, of T. Rhett Smith, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.

Roderic G. Magie, Pensacola, for Appellees.


Reviewing de novo the interpretation of section 440.14(1)(a) (1)(d), Florida Statutes (1987), which is a question of law, see BellSouth Telecomm, Inc. v. Meeks, 863 So.2d 287, 289 (Fla. 2003), we conclude that the Judge of Compensation Claims correctly construed the statute in using Appellant/Claimant's average weekly wage "at the time of the injury," — i.e., the date of his 1988 industrial accident rather than the 2001 date when he was determined to be permanently, totally disabled — as the proper basis for computing compensation. See James v. Armstrong World Indus., Inc., 864 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); Karnes v. City of Boca Raton, 858 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED.

BROWNING, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Flowers v. Acousti Engineering Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 10, 2004
888 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

Flowers v. Acousti Engineering Co.

Case Details

Full title:James A. FLOWERS, Appellant, v. ACOUSTI ENGINEERING COMPANY OF FLORIDA and…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 10, 2004

Citations

888 So. 2d 735 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Rotstein v. Publix Supermarkets

It is well-established that a claimant's AWW is calculated as of the date of the accident, not the date a…