From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Florida v. Lamkin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 13, 2008
987 So. 2d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4D07-2461.

August 13, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Victor Tobin, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03-22250 CA 02.

James C. Sawran and Robert C. Weill of McIntosh, Sawran, Peltz Cartaya, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Maureen G. Pearcy and Andrew E. Grigsby of Hinshaw Culbertson LLP, Miami, for appellees.


We reverse the summary judgment on the common law and contractual indemnity claims. Whether Cleveland Clinic was actively negligent remains a disputed issue of fact. If it was without fault, it is entitled to common law indemnity, see Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA, 731 So.2d 638, 642 (Fla. 1999), and to contractual indemnification under paragraph 15 of the staffing agreement. We disagree with the reading of paragraph 15 that indemnification hinges on the entry of a judgment against Cleveland Clinic. This interpretation ignores the language that Med-Staff "shall indemnify Hospital . . . for any liability, loss, cost, expense or damage whatsoever caused by reason of any act, neglect, default or omission of Agency or any of its agents."

Reversed.

STEVENSON, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Florida v. Lamkin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 13, 2008
987 So. 2d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Florida v. Lamkin

Case Details

Full title:CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA HOSPITAL, Appellant, v. Karon LAMKIN, LPN, and…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 13, 2008

Citations

987 So. 2d 814 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)