From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 8, 1964
162 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 1964)

Opinion

No. 32766.

April 8, 1964.

Writ of Certiorari to District Court of Appeal, Third District.

Bolles Prunty, Miami, for petitioner.

Frates, Fay Floyd, Miami, for respondent.


Our initial consideration of the petition for certiorari suggested jurisdiction in this Court to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, Smith v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, Fla. App., 151 So.2d 70. After oral argument and further careful consideration of the record and briefs, we have concluded that there is no jurisdictional conflict between the decision of the District Court of Appeal and any prior decision of this Court or another District Court of Appeal. The writ is, therefore, discharged.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C.J., and THORNAL, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida
Apr 8, 1964
162 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 1964)
Case details for

Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Apr 8, 1964

Citations

162 So. 2d 663 (Fla. 1964)