From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Florida Dis. v. Windermere Con

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 27, 1999
763 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

holding that an order directing rent money be paid into the registry of the court is appealable under Florida Appellate Rule 9.130(C) “because it determines the right to immediate possession of property, i.e., the rent payments”

Summary of this case from Double Park, LLC v. Kaine Parking 125, LLC

Opinion

No. 99-2887.

Opinion filed October 27, 1999.

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Miette K. Burnstein, Judge; L.T. No. 98-18358 CACE 21.

Steven A. Mason of the Law Offices of Steven A. Mason, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Marvin P. Pastel, II of Becker Poliakoff, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS


Appellant is the lessor under a condominium recreation lease. Appellee is the lessee condominium association, which has apparently stopped making payments on the lease because of this litigation. Appellant moved the court to order the association to pay the rent into the registry of the court pursuant to section 718.401(1)(d), Florida Statutes (1997), which the trial court denied. The lessor has appealed, and the association has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable. We conclude that the order is appealable under Florida Appellate Rule 9.130(a)(3)(c)(ii), because it determines the right to immediate possession of property, i.e., the rent payments. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Molko, 584 So.2d 76 (Fla.3d DCA 1991). We therefore deny the motion to dismiss.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Florida Dis. v. Windermere Con

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 27, 1999
763 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

holding that an order directing rent money be paid into the registry of the court is appealable under Florida Appellate Rule 9.130(C) “because it determines the right to immediate possession of property, i.e., the rent payments”

Summary of this case from Double Park, LLC v. Kaine Parking 125, LLC

concluding that an order denying a motion to require a tenant to pay rent into the registry of the court was appealable because it determined the right to immediate possession of property

Summary of this case from First Hanover v. Vazquez

In Florida Discount Properties, Inc. v. Windermere Condominium, Inc., 763 So.2d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), a lessor filed a motion to have disputed rent paid into the registry of the court.

Summary of this case from Greene v. Borsky
Case details for

Florida Dis. v. Windermere Con

Case Details

Full title:FLORIDA DISCOUNT PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant, v. WINDERMERE CONDOMINIUM…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 27, 1999

Citations

763 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Greene v. Borsky

130(a)(3)(C)(ii) can apply. In Florida Discount Properties, Inc. v. Windermere Condominium, Inc., 763 So.2d…

Tribeca Aes. Med. v. Edge Pilates

See Greene v. Borsky, 961 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (an order determining the right to immediate…