From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 3, 2014
Case No.: 3:14-CV-037 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2014)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:14-CV-037

03-03-2014

ERIC FLORES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al., Defendants.


District Judge Walter H. Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #2), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Plaintiff's complaint (Doc. #3) is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). If Plaintiff appeals this case to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, he should be denied a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation filed on February 11, 2014 (Doc. #2) is ADOPTED in full;
2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and
3. This case is terminated on the docket of this Court.

__________

WALTER HERBERT RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Flores v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 3, 2014
Case No.: 3:14-CV-037 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Flores v. U.S. Attorney Gen.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC FLORES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 3, 2014

Citations

Case No.: 3:14-CV-037 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 3, 2014)