Opinion
Nos. 09-07-386 CR, 09-07-387 CR
Submitted on April 8, 2008.
Opinion Delivered April 23, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court, Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause Nos. 86213 and 86446.
Before GAULTNEY, KREGER, and HORTON, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to plea bargain agreements, appellant Christopher Flores pled guilty to burglary of a building and burglary of a habitation. In each case, the trial court found the evidence was sufficient to find Flores guilty, but deferred finding him guilty. In the burglary of a building case, the trial court placed Flores on community supervision for five years, and in the burglary of a habitation case, the trial court placed Flores on community supervision for ten years and assessed a fine of $500. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Flores's unadjudicated community supervision in each case. Flores pled "true" in both cases to several of the alleged violations of the terms of his community supervision. In each case, the trial court found that Flores violated the conditions of his community supervision and found him guilty. In the burglary of a building case, the trial court assessed punishment at two years of confinement in a state jail facility, and in the burglary of a habitation case, the trial court assessed punishment at five years of confinement in TDCJ. The trial court ordered that the sentences were to run concurrently. Flores's appellate counsel filed a brief in each case that presents counsel's professional evaluation and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). On January 10, 2008, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief in each case. We received no response from the appellant. We reviewed the appellate records, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support the appeals. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeals. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgments. AFFIRMED.
Appellant may challenge our decision in these cases by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.