From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jul 3, 2019
No. 04-19-00329-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2019)

Opinion

No. 04-19-00329-CR

07-03-2019

Jaime FLORES, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2006-CR-6091
Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice DISMISSED

On May 28, 2019, this court ordered appellant to file a response by June 17, 2019, showing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Our May 28, 2019 order noted appellant seeks to appeal a non-appealable order, specifically an order denying his motion for nunc pro tunc. See Brown v. State, No. 03-19-00056-CR, 2019 WL 1051856, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 6, 2019, no pet. h.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). Appellant's court-appointed lawyer timely filed a response stating this court lacks appellate jurisdiction because there is no appealable order. Concluding we lack appellate jurisdiction over this appeal, this appeal is dismissed. See id.

PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH


Summaries of

Flores v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jul 3, 2019
No. 04-19-00329-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2019)
Case details for

Flores v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jaime FLORES, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Jul 3, 2019

Citations

No. 04-19-00329-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 3, 2019)

Citing Cases

Escamilla v. State

This court does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order denying a motion for judgment nunc…

Escamilla v. State

This court does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order denying a motion for judgment nunc…