From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. O'Malley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 12, 2024
2:23-cv-08477-JWH-JDE (C.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-08477-JWH-JDE

02-12-2024

David Gregory Flores v. Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE JOHN D. EARLY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute

On October 6, 2023, David Gregory Flores (“Plaintiff”), through counsel and proceeding in forma pauperis, filed a Complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) seeking a review of a decision denying benefits by the Commissioner. Dkt. 1. On October 10, 2023, the Court ordered the parties to comply with the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), effective December 1, 2022 (“Supp. Rules”), as well as the Local Civil Rules of this district and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in presenting this matter for decision by the Court. Dkt. 7 (“Order”). Per Rule 6 of the Supp. Rules, “The plaintiff must file and serve on the Commissioner a brief for the requested relief within 30 days after the answer is filed or 30 days after entry of an order disposing of the last remaining motion filed under Rule 4(c), whichever is later.” The Commissioner filed his answer on December 11, 2023, and did not file a motion under Rule 4(c). Dkt. 11. As a result, Plaintiff's Brief under Rule 6 of the Supp. Rules was due to be filed by January 10, 2024. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed Plaintiff's Brief in support of her claim for relief.

As a result, Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, in writing, within 8 days from the date of the order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a Court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff may comply with this order to show cause by filing a compliant Brief under Rule 6 of the Supp. Rules. within 8 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff is advised that if Plaintiff fails to file a timely response to this Order, the action may be dismissal for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with Court orders. As Plaintiff will have had 70 days to file his Brief by the deadline for compliance with this Order, no further extension is likely to be granted to Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Flores v. O'Malley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 12, 2024
2:23-cv-08477-JWH-JDE (C.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Flores v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:David Gregory Flores v. Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 12, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-08477-JWH-JDE (C.D. Cal. Feb. 12, 2024)