From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Flores v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 24, 2023
No. 1932-22S (U.S.T.C. Feb. 24, 2023)

Opinion

1932-22S

02-24-2023

JOSE A. CANCIO FLORES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

On June 14, 2022, respondent filed in the above docketed case a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and To Strike as to the Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action for Taxable Year 2019, on the ground that no notice of determination concerning collection action pursuant to section 6320 and/or 6330 of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) had been sent to petitioner with respect to the taxable year 2019, as of the date the petition herein was filed. Although the Court directed petitioner to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioner has failed to do so. [

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's just referenced Motion To Dismiss For Lack of Jurisdiction and To Strike as to the Notice of Determination Concerning Collection Action for Taxable Year 2019 is granted. This case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to any notice of determination concerning collection action for 2019, and references in the petition to such a notice are deemed stricken.


Summaries of

Flores v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 24, 2023
No. 1932-22S (U.S.T.C. Feb. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Flores v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:JOSE A. CANCIO FLORES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Feb 24, 2023

Citations

No. 1932-22S (U.S.T.C. Feb. 24, 2023)