From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Florence v. Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Jan 29, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-640 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-640

01-29-2015

JUSTIN FLORENCE v. STATE OF TEXAS


MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE

Plaintiff, Justin Florence, an inmate currently confined at the Smith Unit with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Factual Background

Plaintiff filed this lawsuit complaining of the conditions of his confinement at the Smith Unit. Plaintiff complains that his constitutional rights were violated because of the prison policy regarding shaving and the issuance of razors. Plaintiff claims inmates are put at an unreasonable risk of serious harm, in violation off the Eighth Amendment.

Analysis

The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bailey, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff'd per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1973).

When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in which the claim arose. Plaintiff's claims arose at the Smith Unit in Dawson County, Texas. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Dawson County, Texas is in the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division. Accordingly, venue in the Eastern District of Texas is not proper.

When venue is not proper, the court "shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). This case should be transferred to the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division. An appropriate order so providing will be entered by the undersigned.

SIGNED this the 29 day of January, 2015.

/s/_________

KEITH F. GIBLIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Florence v. Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Jan 29, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-640 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Florence v. Texas

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN FLORENCE v. STATE OF TEXAS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Jan 29, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-640 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2015)