From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FloQuip, Inc. v. Chem Rock Techs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 31, 2016
CIVIL NO. 6:16-0035 (W.D. La. Aug. 31, 2016)

Summary

noting that the "grammatical structure makes clear that the General Assembly recognized the potential need for some reasonable exceptions in addition to the child care exception while also recognizing that it could not foresee—and therefore could not specifically enumerate—every possible exception" and reasoning that "the general phrase may be understood to allow for an exception when the sex offender has a reason to be in the prohibited area related to his legitimate, cognizable responsibilities, duties, or obligations"

Summary of this case from State v. Collier

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 6:16-0035

08-31-2016

FLOQUIP, INC. v. CHEM ROCK TECHNOLOGIES, ET AL.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHITEHURST

JUDGMENT

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Carol B. Whitehurst for Report and Recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own.

Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Motion to Remand filed by plaintiff, FloQuip, Inc. [rec. doc. 16], is DENIED, and the claims against defendants, David Manly and David Trahan, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) filed by Edward Hostmann, Inc., Kinda Lincoln and Scott Schroeder [rec. doc. 14], is GRANTED, and that the claims against these defendants be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) on Behalf of Enersciences Holdings, LLC, Enersciences Services, LLC, Enersciences, LLC, Rapid Drilling, LLC, and R3 Sciences [rec. doc. 14] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS MOOT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED and that the Motion to Dismiss on Behalf of David Trahan [rec. doc. 17] is DENIED AS MOOT.

Lafayette, Louisiana, this 31 day of August, 2016.

/s/_________

REBECCA F. DOHERTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

FloQuip, Inc. v. Chem Rock Techs.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aug 31, 2016
CIVIL NO. 6:16-0035 (W.D. La. Aug. 31, 2016)

noting that the "grammatical structure makes clear that the General Assembly recognized the potential need for some reasonable exceptions in addition to the child care exception while also recognizing that it could not foresee—and therefore could not specifically enumerate—every possible exception" and reasoning that "the general phrase may be understood to allow for an exception when the sex offender has a reason to be in the prohibited area related to his legitimate, cognizable responsibilities, duties, or obligations"

Summary of this case from State v. Collier
Case details for

FloQuip, Inc. v. Chem Rock Techs.

Case Details

Full title:FLOQUIP, INC. v. CHEM ROCK TECHNOLOGIES, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Aug 31, 2016

Citations

CIVIL NO. 6:16-0035 (W.D. La. Aug. 31, 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Collier

Applying ejusdem generis, it follows that "any other specific or legitimate reason" should not embrace…

FUFC, LLC v. Excel Contractors, LLC

Rec. Doc. 42 p. 10 ("Excel respectfully represents that it is likewise proper to sue Mr. Butaud, the member,…